All library materials
No data
Babyn Yar
en
Голодомор, Голокост і Пораймос у політиці пам’яті України
Максим Гон
Publisher: Рівнененський державний гуманітарний університеет, Історико-соціологічний факультет, Кафедра політичний наук., 2014, 12
The article analyzes the policy of Ukrainian State of commemorating of the victimsof three genocides that were on its territory in 1932–1933 and 1941–1944. The authorreveals the legislative framework of Ukraine on this issue, which gave him reason toapprove the hierarchy of the legal framework of the state (preserving the memory ofHolodomor victims is provided by particular state law, while the genocide of the Roms –by Parliament’s Resolution, and Holocaust Remembrance Day is itemized only by onepoint of Resolution "On the 70th anniversary of the Babi Yar tragedy").Realization of commemorative practices, according to the author, demonstrates thefact that most consistently in Ukraine memory of those who was killed in the Holodomoris honoured, while Roma genocide is marginalized among "figures of memory". M. Gontries to find some asymmetry in the state’s policy on commemorating of the victims ofthree genocides that in the 1930's - 1940's took place on its territory. In particular, heanalyzes the specificity of reflecting of these tragedies in textbooks on Ukrainian historyand world history, solves the problem of inclusion of victims of the Holocaust and thegenocide of the Roms in the collective memory of citizens of Ukraine by representativesof its academic science. The author ascertains the realities of victims of three genocides memory places’ arrangement, representation of the past of separate social groups by state in museums, which have government funding, and notes the fact, that public organizations, which are specialized on genocide of Jews studying and popularization of knowledge about it in Ukrainian society are not supported by state.
Language: Ukrainian
Periodicals title: Панорама політологічних студій